fix(llm): per-code priority cap only under budget pressure (refs #691 #692)

Ruling B15 (coordinator correction on top of 37a970b): B11's "4
priority rows per code" cap was engaging as a default trim rather than
a budget safety net, which regressed the g2064-g2065 golden entry —
G2064 legitimately has 6 priority-kind lineage rows (replaced_by x3,
created, disappeared) and the cap silently dropped 2 of them even
though the question's whole lineage selection had plenty of room under
the hard cap.

llm.lineage._select_for_prompt now computes the unrestricted selection
(every priority row kept, exactly as before B11) first; only when that
would exceed the hard cap (2 * max_rows) does the per-code cap engage
as a fallback. Under budget, every priority row for every code
survives regardless of count.

Tests: replaced the single "always caps at 4" case with two — 6
priority rows for one code all survive under a generous max_rows (hard
cap 50), the same 6 rows trim to 4 under a tight one (hard cap 4).

Re-ran g2064-g2065-to-99424-99426-rate and ccm-history in-process
against the live replica: both PASS (g2064's missing anchor,
JE7KYBW3 p1111, is back).

src/llm/lineage.py

@@ -189,32 +189,51 @@ def _guidance_line(g: GuidanceRef) -> str:
 def _select_for_prompt(
     events: Sequence[LineageEvent], max_rows: int
 ) -> list[LineageEvent]:
-    """Every priority-kind event (capped at ``_PRIORITY_PER_CODE_CAP``
+    """Every priority-kind event, plus the earliest-sorted non-priority
-    per code — Ruling B11), plus the earliest-sorted non-priority
+    events, up to *max_rows* total — priority rows are never dropped by
-    events, up to *max_rows* total — priority rows are never dropped
+    the non-priority budget. The whole selection is hard-capped at
-    by the non-priority budget, but the whole selection is still hard-
+    ``2 * max_rows`` (Ruling B11: a question with many eventful codes
-    capped at ``2 * max_rows`` (Ruling B11: a question with many
+    could otherwise make priority rows alone blow the prompt).
-    eventful codes could otherwise make priority rows alone blow the
+
-    prompt). Selection is by identity (``id()``), not value equality,
+    Ruling B15: the per-code priority cap (``_PRIORITY_PER_CODE_CAP``,
-    so it stays correct before FR urls are resolved (several collapsed
+    introduced by B11) is a budget SAFETY NET, not a default trim — it
-    rows can otherwise compare equal on every other field), and render
+    only engages when keeping every priority row would exceed the hard
-    order follows *events*' own (chronological) order. Shared by
+    cap. When the unrestricted selection already fits within
+    ``2 * max_rows``, every priority row survives exactly as it did
+    before B11 (a code with 6 legitimate replaces/replaced_by rows, say,
+    keeps all 6 as long as the question as a whole has room).
+
+    Selection is by identity (``id()``), not value equality, so it
+    stays correct before FR urls are resolved (several collapsed rows
+    can otherwise compare equal on every other field), and render order
+    follows *events*' own (chronological) order. Shared by
     ``LineageEvidence.prompt_block`` (final render) and
     ``lineage_evidence`` (deciding which rows are worth an FR url
     lookup — ruling: resolve links only for what the model will see)."""
+    hard_cap = 2 * max_rows
+    priority_all = [e for e in events if e.kind in _PRIORITY_KINDS]
+    rest = [e for e in events if e.kind not in _PRIORITY_KINDS]
+
+    budget_all = max(max_rows - len(priority_all), 0)
+    total_all = len(priority_all) + min(len(rest), budget_all)
+    if total_all <= hard_cap:
+        # Under budget pressure (Ruling B15) — keep every priority row.
+        keep = {id(e) for e in priority_all} | {id(e) for e in rest[:budget_all]}
+    else:
+        # Over the hard cap even before any per-code trimming — fall
+        # back to B11's per-code safety net.
         per_code: dict[str, int] = {}
         priority_ids: set[int] = set()
-    for e in events:
+        for e in priority_all:
-        if e.kind in _PRIORITY_KINDS:
             n = per_code.get(e.code, 0)
             if n < _PRIORITY_PER_CODE_CAP:
                 priority_ids.add(id(e))
                 per_code[e.code] = n + 1
-    rest = [e for e in events if e.kind not in _PRIORITY_KINDS]
         budget = max(max_rows - len(priority_ids), 0)
         keep = priority_ids | {id(e) for e in rest[:budget]}
+
     selected = [e for e in events if id(e) in keep]
-    return selected[: 2 * max_rows]
+    return selected[:hard_cap]
 
 
 @dataclass(frozen=True)

tests/llm/test_lineage.py

@@ -727,9 +727,12 @@ class TestPromptBlock:
         for kind in ("created", "replaces", "replaced_by", "deleted"):
             assert kind in rendered
 
-    def test_priority_rows_capped_at_four_per_code(self):
+    def test_under_budget_every_priority_row_for_a_code_survives(self):
-        """Ruling B11: a single code with 6 priority-kind rows only ever
+        """Ruling B15: the per-code priority cap is a budget safety net,
-        gets 4 of them into the prompt."""
+        not a default trim — under the hard cap (2 * max_prompt_rows),
+        a single code's 6 legitimate priority-kind rows (e.g. several
+        genuine replaces/replaced_by events over the years) all survive,
+        exactly as before B11 introduced the per-code cap."""
         priorities = [
             LineageEvent(
                 "99490",
@@ -754,7 +757,40 @@ class TestPromptBlock:
             events=tuple(priorities),
             element_diffs=(),
             guidance=(),
-            max_prompt_rows=25,
+            max_prompt_rows=25,  # hard cap 50 — 6 priority rows fit easily
+        )
+        rendered = ev.prompt_block()
+        assert sum(rendered.count(f"[L{i}]") for i in range(6)) == 6
+
+    def test_over_budget_priority_rows_for_a_code_trim_to_four(self):
+        """Ruling B15: the same 6 priority-kind rows for one code, but
+        with a hard cap (2 * max_prompt_rows) too small to hold them —
+        the per-code cap of 4 engages as the safety net."""
+        priorities = [
+            LineageEvent(
+                "99490",
+                2020 + i,
+                "replaces",
+                (),
+                (),
+                f"[L{i}]",
+                "K",
+                i,
+                0,
+                "",
+                "fr",
+                True,
+                "",
+            )
+            for i in range(6)
+        ]
+        ev = LineageEvidence(
+            codes=("99490",),
+            families=(),
+            events=tuple(priorities),
+            element_diffs=(),
+            guidance=(),
+            max_prompt_rows=2,  # hard cap 4 — 6 priority rows don't fit
         )
         rendered = ev.prompt_block()
         assert sum(rendered.count(f"[L{i}]") for i in range(6)) == 4